The call came through the office land line, through a system that was at least twenty years old and had fought off all technological advances. It was taken by a tattooed receptionist named Felicity, a new girl who would be gone before she fully understood the phones. They were all leaving, it seemed, especially the clerical help. Turnover was ridiculous. Morale was low. The Board on Judicial Conduct had just seen its budget chopped for the fourth straight year by a legislature that hardly knew it existed.
Felicity managed to route the call down the hall to the cluttered desk of Lacy Stoltz. “There’s a call on line three,” she announced.
“Who is it?” Lacy asked.
“She wouldn’t say.”
There were so many ways to respond. At that moment, though, Lacy was bored, and she did not wish to waste the emotional energy necessary to properly chastise the kid and set her straight. Routines and protocols were crumbling. Office discipline was waning as BJC spiraled into a leaderless mess.
As a veteran, the veteran, it was important to set an example. “Thanks,” she said and punched the blinking light. “Lacy Stoltz.”
“Good afternoon, Ms. Stoltz. Do you have a moment?”
Female, educated, no hint of an accent, mid-forties, give or take three years. Lacy always played the voice game. “And to whom do I have the pleasure?”
“My name is Margie for now, but I use other ones.”
Lacy was amused and almost chuckled. “Well, at least you’re up front about it. It normally takes me some time to work through the aliases.”
Anonymous callers were routine. People with gripes about judges were always cautious and hesitant to come forward and take on the system. Almost all feared retaliation from the powers on high.
Margie said, “I’d like to talk to you, somewhere private.”
“My office is private, if you’d like.”
“Oh no,” she snapped, apparently frightened at the thought. “That won’t work. You know the Siler Building, next door?”
“Of course,” Lacy said as she stood and looked out her window at the Siler Building, one of several nondescript government addresses in downtown Tallahassee.
Margie said, “There’s a coffee bar on the ground floor. Can we meet there?”
“I suppose. When?”
“Now. I’m on my second latte.”
“Slow down. Give me a few minutes. And you’ll recognize me?”
“Yes. You’re on the website. I’m in the rear, left side.”
Lacy’s office was indeed private. The one to her left was empty, vacated by an ex-colleague who’d moved on to a bigger agency. Across the hall an office had been converted into a makeshift storage closet. She walked toward Felicity and ducked into the office of Darren Trope, a two-year man already prowling for another job.
“You busy?” she asked as she interrupted whatever he was doing.
“Not really.” It didn’t matter what he was or was not doing. If Lacy needed anything, Darren belonged to her.
“Need a favor. I’m stepping over to Siler to meet a stranger who just admitted that she is using a fake name.”
“Oh, I love the cloak-and-dagger. Sure beats sitting here reading about some judge who made lewd comments to a witness.”
“Any photos, videos?”
“Let me know if you get them. So, mind stepping over in fifteen minutes and taking a picture?”
“Sure. No problem. No idea who she is?”
Lacy left the building, took her time walking around the block, enjoyed a moment of cool air, and strolled into the lobby of the Siler Building. It was almost 4:00 p.m. and there were no other customers drinking coffee at that hour. Margie was at a small table in the rear, to the left. She waved quickly as though someone might notice and she didn’t want to get caught. Lacy smiled and walked toward her.
African American, mid-forties, professional, attractive, educated, slacks and heels and dressed nicer than Lacy, though around BJC these days any and all attire was allowed. The old boss wanted coats and ties and hated jeans, but he had retired two years ago and took most of the rules with him.
Lacy passed the counter where the barista was loafing with both elbows stuck on the Formica, hands cradling her pink phone that had her thoroughly fascinated. She did not look up, never thought about greeting a customer, and Lacy decided to pass on more caffeine anyway.
Without standing, Margie stuck out a hand and said, “Nice to meet you. Would you like some coffee?”
Lacy smiled, shook her hand, and sat across the square table. “No thanks. And it’s Margie, right?”
“Okay, we’re off to a bad start. Why are you using an alias?”
“My story will take hours to tell and I’m not sure you want to hear it.”
“Then why bother?”
“Please, Ms. Stoltz.”
“Please, Lacy. You have no idea the emotional trauma I’ve been through trying to get to this point in my life. I’m a wreck right now, okay?”
She seemed fine, though a bit on edge. Perhaps it was the second latte. Her eyes darted right and left. They were pretty and surrounded by large purple frames. The lenses were probably not needed. The glasses were part of the outfit, a subtle disguise.
Lacy said, “I’m not sure what to say. Why don’t you start talking and maybe we’ll get somewhere?”
“I’ve read about you.” She reached down into a backpack and deftly pulled out a file. “The Indian casino case, not long ago. You caught a judge skimming and put her away. One reporter described it as the largest bribery scandal in the history of American jurisprudence.” The file was two inches thick and gave every impression of being immaculately organized.
Lacy noted the use of the word “jurisprudence.” Odd for a layperson.
“It was a big case,” she said, feigning modesty.
Margie smiled and said, “Big? You broke up a crime syndicate, nailed the judge, and sent a bunch of people to prison. All are still there, I believe.”
“True, but it was far from a one-girl takedown. The FBI was heavily involved. It was a complicated case and some people were killed.”
“Including your colleague, Mr. Hugo Hatch.”
“Yes, including Hugo. Curious. Why all of this research about me?”
Margie folded her hands and rested them on top of the file, which she had not opened. Her index fingers were shaking slightly. She looked at the entrance and glanced around again, though no one had entered, no one had left, no one had moved, not even the barista who was lost in the clouds. She took a sip from her straw. If it really was her second latte, it had barely been touched. She had used the word “trauma.” Admitted to being a “wreck.” Lacy realized the woman was frightened.
Margie said, “Oh, I’m not sure it’s research. Just some stuff off the Internet. Everything’s out there, you know.”
Lacy smiled and tried to be patient. “I’m not sure we’re getting anywhere.”
“Your job is to investigate judges who are accused of wrongdoing, right?”
“And you’ve been doing it for how long?”
“I’m sorry. Why is this relevant?”
“Twelve years.” Giving that number was like admitting defeat. It sounded so long.
“How do you get involved in a case?” Margie asked, bouncing around.
Lacy took a deep breath and reminded herself to be patient. People with complaints who got this far were often rattled. She smiled and said, “Well, typically a person with a complaint against a judge will contact us and we’ll have a meeting. If the gripe appears to have some merit, then the person will file a formal complaint, which we keep locked up for forty-five days while we take a look. We call it an assessment. Nine times out of ten that’s as far as it gets and the complaint is dismissed. If we find possible wrongdoing, then we notify the judge and he or she has thirty days to respond. Usually, everybody lawyers up. We investigate, have hearings, bring in witnesses, the works.”
As she spoke, Darren strolled in alone, disturbed the barista by ordering decaf, waited on it while ignoring the two women, then took it to a table on the other side of the room where he opened a laptop and began what appeared to be some serious work. Without giving the slightest hint, he aimed the laptop’s camera at Lacy’s back and Margie’s face, zoomed in for a close shot, and began filming. He took a video and some still shots.
If Margie noticed him it was not apparent.
She listened intently to Lacy and asked, “How often is a judge removed from office?”
Again, why is this relevant? “Not very often, fortunately. We have jurisdiction over one thousand judges and the vast majority are honest, hardworking professionals. Most of the complaints we see are just not that serious. Disgruntled litigants who didn’t get what they wanted. A lot of divorce cases. A lot of lawyers mad because they lost. We stay busy, but for the most part the conflicts are resolved.”
She made the job sound boring, and, after twelve years, it rather felt that way.
Margie listened carefully, her fingertips tapping the file. She took a deep breath and asked, “The person who files the complaint, is he or she always identified?”
Lacy thought for a second and said, “Eventually, yes. It’s quite rare for the complaining party to remain anonymous.”
“Because the complainant usually knows the facts of the case and needs to testify against the judge. It’s hard to nail a judge when the people he ticked off are afraid to come forward. Are you afraid?”
The very word seemed to frighten her. “Yes, you could say that,” she admitted.
Lacy frowned and appeared bored. “Look, let’s cut to the chase here. How serious is the behavior that you’re talking about?”
Margie closed her eyes and managed to say, “Murder.”
She immediately opened them and glanced around to see if anyone had overheard. There was no one close enough to hear anything except Lacy, who absorbed this with the hard-boiled skepticism she had developed after so many years on the job. She reminded herself again to be patient. When she looked at Margie’s eyes again they were wet.
Lacy leaned in a bit closer and softly asked, “Are you suggesting that one of our sitting judges has committed a murder?”
Margie bit her lip and shook her head. “I know he has.”
“May I ask how you know this?”
“My father was one of his victims.”
Lacy inhaled this and glanced around herself. “Victims? As in more than one?”
“Yes. I believe my father was his second victim. I’m not sure which number, but I’m certain of his guilt.”
“That’s an understatement. How many complaints have you had about judges killing people?”
“Exactly. In the history of America, how many judges have been convicted of murder while on the bench?”
“I’ve never heard of one.”
“Exactly. Zero. So don’t dismiss this as something ‘interesting.’ ”
“Didn’t mean to offend.”
Across the way, Darren finished his important business and left. Neither woman acknowledged his departure.
Margie said, “No offense taken. I’m not going any further in this coffee bar. I have a lot of information that I would like to share with you and no one else, but not here.”
Lacy had encountered her share of nuts and unbalanced souls with boxes and paper sacks filled with documents that clearly proved that some sleazeball up on the bench was thoroughly corrupt. Almost always, after a few minutes of face-to-face interaction, she could reach her verdict and began making plans to route the complaint to the dismissal drawer. Over the years she had learned to read people, though with many of the wackos that came her way a quick evaluation wasn’t much of a challenge.
Margie, or whoever, was neither a nut nor a wacko, nor an unbalanced soul. She was onto something and she was frightened.
Lacy said, “Okay. Where do we go next?”
“What is next?”
“Look, you contacted me. Do you want to talk or not? I don’t play games and I don’t have time to pry information out of you or any other person who wants to complain about a judge. I waste a lot of time cajoling information out of people who call me in the first place. I go down a dead-end trail once a month. Are you talking or not?”
Margie was crying again and wiping her cheeks. Lacy studied her with as much compassion as possible, but she was also willing to leave the table and never come back.
However, she was intrigued by the idea of murder. Part of her daily grind around BJC was suffering through the mundane and frivolous gripes of unhappy people with small problems and little to lose. A murder by a sitting judge seemed too sensational to believe.
Finally, Margie said, “I have a room at the Ramada on East Gaines. We could meet there after hours. But you have to come alone.”
Lacy nodded as if she’d anticipated this. “With precautions. We have a rule that prohibits me from conducting an initial meeting with a complaining party off premises and alone. I would have to bring another investigator, one of my colleagues.”
“Like Mr. Trope over there?” Margie asked, nodding at Darren’s empty chair.
Lacy slowly turned around to see what in the world she was talking about as she tried desperately to think of a response.
Margie continued, “It’s your website, okay? Smiling faces of all staff.” From her briefcase she removed an 8×10 color photo of herself and slid it across the table. “Here, with best wishes, a current color mug of myself that’s far better than the ones Mr. Trope just stole.”
“What are you talking about?”
“I’m sure he’s already run my pic through your facial recognition software and he’s found nothing. I’m in nobody’s data bank.”
“What are you talking about?” Margie was dead-on but Lacy was rattled and not ready to come clean.
“Oh, I think you know. You come alone or you’ll never see me again. You’re the most experienced investigator in your office and at this moment your boss is only a temp. You can probably do whatever you want.”
“I wish it were that easy.”
“Let’s call it an after-work drink, that’s all. We’ll meet in the bar and if it goes well we can go upstairs to my room and talk with even more privacy.”
“I cannot go to your room. It’s against our procedures. If a complaint is filed and it becomes necessary to meet in private, then I can do so. Someone has to know where I am, at least initially.”
“Fair enough. What time?”
“How about six?”
“I’ll be in the back corner, right hand side, and I’ll be alone, same as you. No wires, recorders, secret cameras, no colleagues pretending to drink as they film away. And say hello to Darren. Maybe one day I’ll have the pleasure. Deal?”
Is John Grisham's The judge's list a sequel? ›
“The Judge's List” is John Grisham's sequel to “The Whistler.” This time, there's a judge even more corrupt than the one Grisham saw nailed at the end of his earlier work.What is the judges list about by John Grisham? ›
The Judge's List - John Grisham. Nonstop suspense from the #1 New York Times bestselling author: Investigator Lacy Stoltz follows the trail of a serial killer, and closes in on a shocking suspect—a sitting judge.Do I need to read The Whistler before the judge's list? ›
Another Grisham book is The Whistler, in which he first introduces us to Lacy. There is no need to read The Whistler before the The Judge's List.Is the judges list a standalone book? ›
We first met protagonist Lacy Stoltz in The Whistler, however, you don't need to have read the first book in the series to enjoy this; The Judge's List reads as a standalone.How many books are in the judges Series? ›
Answer and Explanation: The Book of Judges is one single book. The book includes 21 specific chapters. Within those chapters, the book follows 13 judges and their role in the salvation (or oppression) of the Israelites.What order should you read John Grisham books? ›
- A Painted House.
- A Time for Mercy.
- A Time to Kill.
- Calico Joe.
- Camino Island.
- Camino Winds.
- Don't Quit Your Day Job.
What's the big idea? The primary message of Judges is that God will not allow sin to go unpunished. As Exodus established, Israel was God's people—He was their King. They had forsaken the covenant established at Mount Sinai.What is the main purpose of the book of Judges? ›
Purpose and Pattern
The book of Judges was written to show the consequences of religious unfaithfulness and to point the way to a king who, if righteous, would lead the people to God. In the book of Joshua, the people of Israel seemed to want to follow the Lord and obey his commands.
The book of Judges details the corruption and downward spiral of Israel's judges, but this brutal history still offers future hope for Israel. Israel abandons God and becomes completely corrupt in the land. What happens when Israel forgets their God? The book of Judges shows Israel's tragic downward spiral.What is the best John Grisham book to start with? ›
The Firm by John Grisham
The best John Grisham book to start with is The Firm, this is Grisham's most popular novel, and it's the one that made him a household name. This novel tells the story of a young attorney who gets an offer from a prestigious law firm in Memphis.
How many books are in The Whistler series? ›
The The Whistler series consist of 1 suspense book written by John Grisham au author .Was The Whistler made into a movie? ›
The Whistler was adapted into a film Noir series of eight films by Columbia Pictures. The Voice of the Whistler was provided by an uncredited Otto Forrest. In the first seven films, veteran actor Richard Dix played the main character in the story -- a different character in each film.Why is it called the book of Judges? ›
The judges to whom the title refers were charismatic leaders who delivered Israel from a succession of foreign dominations after their conquest of Canaan, the Promised Land. The introduction is an account of the conquest of Canaan (1:1–2:5) and a characterization of the period of the judges (2:6–3:6).Is the book of Judges in chronological order? ›
Although some scholars consider the stories not to be presented in chronological order, the judges in the order in which they appear in the text are: Othniel (3:9–11) vs. Chushan-Rishathaim, King of Aram; Israel has 40 years of peace until the death of Othniel.What are the 3 major sections of the book of Judges? ›
- The Situation in Canaan Following the Israelite Conquest (1:1–3:6)
- Stories of the Judges (3:7–16:31)
- Further Stories of the Tribes of Dan and Benjamin (17:1–21:25)
It definitely is a shorter manga, as it only has 6 volumes, and it leaves room for some necessary details that were left out, and a slightly rushed ending to get to a conclusion as to why people were paying for their sins, or crimes.Who are the 12 Judges in the book of Judges? ›
The Book of Judges mentions twelve leaders who are said to "judge" Israel: Othniel, Ehud, Shamgar, Deborah, Gideon, Tola, Jair, Jephthah, Ibzan, Elon, Abdon, and Samson.What is the recurring cycle in the book of Judges? ›
the book of judges has a repetitive pattern, it goes something like — the people abandon God with disbelief and worshiping false gods —> God gets angry and punishes the people —> the people cry for God's help —> God raises up a deliverer, or judge —> the people repent and turn back to God —> the people fall back into ...What author is most like John Grisham? ›
- David Baldacci.
- Michael Connelly.
- Scott Turow.
- Lisa Scottoline.
- Steve Martini.
- William Bernhardt.
- Tom Clancy.
- Lee Child.
I fell in love with John Steinbeck. When I was struggling to finish my first novel in 1987, Scott Turow published Presumed Innocent. It was a blockbuster, and Scott was the newest literary star. I can't say I felt cemented, but the book certainly motivated me to finish A Time to Kill.
Will John Grisham have a new book in 2022? ›
By Laura Kemp | July 6 2022 | Adult. Share the cover over @JohnGrisham on Instagram and learn more about the book at www.JGrisham.com! #1 New York Times bestselling author John Grisham returns to Mississippi in his most gripping thriller yet.What lesson can we gain from the story of Judges? ›
As students study the book of Judges, they can learn that the Lord allows His people to suffer the consequences of being unfaithful to Him. Students will also see that the Lord is willing to deliver His people as often as they repent of their sins.What is the theology of the book of Judges? ›
The book of Judges shows that God will keep His word and will not overlook disobedience, but also that He is always willing to forgive his people and rectify their transgressions. God will stay faithful to his promise but Israel must live in obedience to inherit the benefits of the promise.What is the conclusion of the book of Judges? ›
The last verse in Judges reads, “In those days there was no king in Israel; all the people did what right in their own eyes” (21:25), this conclusion is perfect for a book whose entire writings describe a time of such turmoil.Who wrote the book of Judges in the Bible? ›
Samuel, the Talmud says, wrote the Book of Judges and the Book of Samuel, until his death, at which point the prophets Nathan and Gad picked up the story. And the Book of Kings, according to tradition, was written by the prophet Jeremiah.What is the last verse of the book of Judges? ›
Judges 21:25 Parallel Verses [⇓ See commentary ⇓]
Judges 21:25, KJV: In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes.
- Judge Ehud. In Judges 3:16, we read that Ehud visited the Moabites' King Eglon under the pretense of paying a tribute. ...
- Judge Deborah. ...
- Judge Gideon and his son Abimelech. ...
- Judge Jephthah. ...
- Judge Samson.
MY #1 FAVOURITE. The start is easy: all-time favourite is Five Go to Smuggler's Top, so that has to occupy the #1 slot. I have always loved Smuggler's Top, though I find the 'why' very hard to put it into words.What is John Grisham's newest release? ›
The Housemaid's Secret: A totally gripping psychological thriller with a shocking twist. This title will be released on February 20, 2023.Which is first The Whistler or the judges list? ›
|0.5||Witness to a Trial||Sep-2016|
|2||The Judge's List||Oct-2021|
Is there a prequel to The Whistler? ›
John Grisham sets up an enthralling crime-legal thriller for the highly anticipated, The Whistler, coming October 25, with a fully loaded action-packed prequel, WITNESS TO A TRIAL.What book came before the judges list? ›
The Judge's List (2021) is a legal-suspense novel written by American author John Grisham, published by Doubleday on October 19, 2021. It builds on characters introduced in Grisham's 2016 novel The Whistler, including Florida Board on Judicial Conduct investigator Lacy Stoltz.Why did they stop making John Grisham movies? ›
Grisham agreed that studios “would rather spend the big money on 'Superman' or 'Spider Man 5' or whatever.” “As we know, there are so few good adult dramas being made, you can't find one,” he said. He acknowledged it's especially confusing considering how well the adaptations of his novels did at the box office.How many John Grisham books have become movies? ›
7 memorable John Grisham books made into movies of all-time.What were the big 5 movie studios in the 1930s? ›
The Big Five (and Little Three)
These were five major film studios that were responsible for the classical Hollywood system. They included Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Warner Bros., Paramount, Fox, and RKO. All of which were "vertically integrated" meaning that production, distribution, and exhibition were handled "in-house."
We are told to look out for our own self-interests instead of loving our neighbor as ourselves. These choices are as important today as they were in the days of the judges. The book of Judges is characterized by the people of Israel doing as they saw fit – that is, they did what was right in their own eyes.Who is the first woman named in the book of Judges? ›
According to the Book of Judges, Deborah (Hebrew: דְּבוֹרָה, Dəḇōrā, "bee") was a prophetess of the God of the Israelites, the fourth Judge of pre-monarchic Israel and the only female judge mentioned in the Bible.Who is the most famous judge in the world? ›
- 1 of 20. Judge Judy. Getty Images/Getty Images for Children's Diabetes Foundation. ...
- 2 of 20. Judge Wapner. Bob Riha, Jr./Getty Images. ...
- 3 of 20. Judge Mills Lane. ...
- 4 of 20. Judge Joe Brown. ...
- 5 of 20. Lance Ito. ...
- 6 of 20. Harry T. ...
- 7 of 20. Judge Snyder. ...
- 8 of 20. Phil Banks.
In chronological order: Othniel, Ehud, Shamgar, Deborah/Barak, Gideon, Tola, Jair, Jephthah, Ibzan , Elon, Abdon , and Samson. There were two other Judges, Eli and Samuel whose judgeships are described in 1 Samuel. They exercised their authority over the entire nation until the institution of the monarchy.Does the book of Judges have a happy ending? ›
The conclusion of the book of Judges is anything but a happy ending. It is a depressing, horribly discouraging book. Throughout the whole book, we have been searching for a deliverer. We have studied some judges who did pretty well, some who messed up, and others who just downright failed.
What tribe did the Judges come from? ›
The first Tola was one of the sons of Issachar (whose family formed the tribe that Tola the judge belonged to), making “Tola” the name of a clan as well. Tola the judge was the son of Puah, which is an alternative spelling of Puvah, which is the name of one of the first Tola's brothers.What are the four sin cycle of the book of Judges? ›
The Israelites fell into a continuous cycle of sin, bondage, deliverance, and peace. Every judge was imperfect, yet God worked through the judges.What are the 5 steps of the cycle of sin? ›
James describes five stages in the life of sin.
- Sin begins with evil desire (1:14) ...
- Evil desire conceives (1:15) ...
- Sin is born (1:15) ...
- Sin grows (1:15) ...
- Sin produces death (1:15)